The Mercury  
Founded 2010
Serving Roseville, Rocklin, Lincoln and Placer County
 
  Home Community Finance Employment Your Home Your Money Your Kids Your Health  
  Business Education Politics Police & Fire Veterans' News Real Estate Consumer News Taxes  
  Church Food Recipes Gardening Car Care Fashion Beauty Pets  
  Lifestyles Sports Feature Writers Entertainment Environment Human Interest Technology Travel  

Your "Local Sunday Newspaper" Seven Days a Week!

Champs SportsLinksynergy
California Job Journal
Mercury and Rainbow Rewards
In Association with Amazon.com

Pets

Owners Would Spend Thousands To Save Pets’ Lives

Posted: 12/8/2011

Owners Would Spend Thousands To Save Pets’ Lives

(NAPSI)—Planning ahead and budgeting for the cost of pet health could help you feel more prepared when you face a serious health situation with your pet.

“Determining how much we are willing or able to spend to sustain the life of a pet is a decision none of us ever wants to make, but given the rising cost of pet health care, it’s often an inevitable one,” said Dr. Jennifer Coates, a Colorado-based veterinarian and author.

According to a recent survey by The Kroger Co., approximately one in 10 dog or cat owners is willing to spend more than $3,000 on medical procedures if it meant that their pet could be saved. Meanwhile, a majority of pet owners (61 percent) surveyed said they would be willing to spend between $100 and $1,000 to save Fluffy or Fido’s life. Another 15 percent are comfortable spending between $1,000 and $3,000 for lifesaving medical care for their pet.

When asked what they fear most about their pet’s well-being, about one in four of dog owners said cancer (27 percent), followed by hip/knee/leg injury (17 percent) and getting hit by a car (16 percent). The biggest concern for cat owners was kidney disease (19 percent), cancer (17 percent) and injuries sustained by fights with other animals (10 percent).

Only a small percentage of the pet owners surveyed said they had pet insurance--4 percent of dog owners and 2 percent of cat owners. However, 61 percent of dog owners and 48 percent of cat owners said they would consider purchasing pet insurance if it costs under $20 per month.

Interestingly, at least half of pet owners (55 percent with dogs, 51 percent with cats) would be interested in adding their pets to their own health insurance plans, if such a thing were allowed.

“Veterinary care has become increasingly more sophisticated and expensive, with some lifesaving treatments running as high as $5,000 or more,” said Dr. Coates. “Those potential out-of-pocket costs are what make pet insurance a prudent investment. And from an emotional standpoint, pet insurance keeps owners from having to ask that dreaded question, ‘how much can I spend to keep my pet alive?’”

More information is available at www.savewithpetinsurance. com.

Potential out-of-pocket costs are what make pet insurance a prudent investment.

 

Funnies Extra
Messenger Publishing Group

Advertise With Us
Classified Advertising
About the Mercury
Letters to the Editor
Previous Issues

Front Page Sports
MBK Homes

Legal Advertising Hotline
Call Dan Direct at
916-532-2113
dan@carmichaeltimes.com
Legal Advertising Rates

 



Top Stories
 

California News
 



The Mercury | Copyright Notice
The Mercury | Paul V. Scholl, Publisher
7405 Greenback Lane, #129 | Citrus Heights, CA 95610-5603 | Telephone: 916-773-1111 | Fax Line 916-773-2999
Email: publisher@PlacerMercury.com | Site Designed and Hosted by TheSiteBarn.com
ISSN#: 1948-1934

View PDF files of Back Issues